KOPRAN Auditors Report

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF KOPRAN LIMITED


Report on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Kopran Limited (‘the Company”) which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.


Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements


The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these financial Statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safeguarding of the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.


Auditor’s Responsibility


Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.


We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made there under.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.


An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement.


We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the financial statements.


Opinion


In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31st March, 2016, and its profits and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.


Emphasis of Matter


We draw attention to Note 43 of the financial statements, whereby, the management is of the opinion that no provision is required in respect of investment made in the subsidiary company Kopran Research Laboratories Limited for reasons stated there in. Our opinion is not modified in respect of the matter.


Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements


1 As required by Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2016 (‘the Order’) issued by Central Government of India in terms of sub section 11 of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure -A a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order.


2 As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:


(a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.


(b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.


(c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account.


(d) In our opinion, the aforesaid financial statements comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.


(e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31st March, 2016 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2016 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the Act.


(f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal Financial controls over financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls refer to our separate report in ‘Annexure B’and


(g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:


i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its financial statements-refer note 27 to the financial statements.


ii. The Company did not have any long-term contracts including derivative contracts for which there were any material foreseeable losses;


iii. There were no amounts which were required to be transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.


(Referred to in paragraph 1 under ‘Report on other legal and Regulatory requirements’section of our report of even date)


(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets, however the register is not completely updated.


(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets by which fixed assets are verified in a phased periodical manner. In accordance with this programme, certain fixed assets were verified during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.


(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the Company.


(ii) The management has conducted physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals during the year. Discrepancies noted on physical verification of inventories were not material, and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.


(iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to Companies, Firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act. Accordingly, paragraph 3 (iii) of the Order is not applicable.


(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Act, with respect to the loans and investments made. The Company has not given any guarantee or provided any security in connection with loans to any other body corporate or person during the year.


(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits during the year within the meaning of the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed there under.


(vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Act in respect of its products and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have not carried out a detailed examination of the accounts and records with a view to determine whether these are accurate or complete.


(vii) a. The company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees'''' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities, though there have been delays in a few cases.


According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no undisputed dues in respect of provident fund, employees'''' state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues, which were outstanding, at the year-end for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.


b. According to the information and explanations given to us, dues outstanding of sales tax, value added tax, service tax and duty of excise that have not been deposited on account of any dispute are as follows:






























































Name of the Statute



Nature of Dues



Amount (Rs. in Lakhs)



For the Period



Forum where dispute is pending



Central Excise Act



Excise Duty



14.06



1998-2002, 2002-2003, 2004-2005



Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal







2.16



2011-2012



Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal)







5.05



2012-2013



Joint Secretary of Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance







6.48



2012-2013, 1990-1991



Commissioner of Central Excise







0.44



2014-2015



Commissioner of Central Excise



Finance Act, 1994



Service Tax



38.99



2001-2002



High Court (Mumbai)



Drug Price Control Order - 95



Difference in pricing



591.34



2000-2003



High Court (Mumbai)



(viii) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans to banks and financial institution. There were no outstanding dues to any debenture holders anytime during the year.


(ix) The Company did not raise any money by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments). In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, term loans were applied by the Company for the purpose for which those were raised.


(x) According to the information and explanations given to us, no material fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.


(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has paid for managerial remuneration in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Act.


(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly the paragraph 3 (xii) of the Order is not applicable.


(xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, transactions with related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of the Act where applicable and details of such transactions have been disclosed in the financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.


(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has made preferential allotment/private placement of shares during the year and the company has complied with the requirements of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the amount raised has been used for the purpose for which the funds were raised.


(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not entered into non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable


(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India, 1934.


For BATLIBOI & PUROHIT


Chartered Accountants


ICAI Firm Registration No. 101048W


Kaushal Mehta


Place : Mumbai Partner


Date : 30th May, 2016 Membership No.111749

CIN: U67190WB2003PTC096617. Trading in Commodities is done through our Group Company Dynamic Commodities Pvt. Ltd. The company is also engaged in Proprietory Trading apart from Client Business.
“2019 © COPYRIGHT DYNAMIC EQUITIES PVT. LTD.”

Disclaimer: There is no guarantee of profits or no exceptions from losses. The investment advice provided are solely the personal views of the research team. You are advised to rely on your own judgment while making investment / Trading decisions. Past performance is not an indicator of future returns. Investment is subject to market risks. You should read and understand the Risk Disclosure Documents before trading/Investing.

Disclosure: We, Dynamic Equities Private Limited are also engaged in Proprietory Trading apart from Client Business. In case of any complaints/grievances, clients may write to us at compliance@dynamiclevels.com

  • Download our Mobile App
  • Available on Google Play
  • Available on App Store
  • RSS